Theology is based upon one primary precept; and that is authentic sacramental disciplic succession of the priesthood, not the genealogy of the congregation, never simply exposure to priesthood philosophies, nor even association with Ya-Jew (YaJu) Priests in a Pharaoh King's house.

         Of course in social orders amongst lay masses in times of emergency there has been call for inspiring lay leaders, even saintly persons who were later termed prophets, seers, saints, and all the spiritually respectful terminologies of the lay multitude. Lay prophets are certainly required and most welcome amongst barbarians; though in terms of The Holy Fire of The Sacred Consummation in anything pertaining to The Holy Name of "Jew" there existed a formally consecrated and qualified line of disciplic succession. Thus in those times of emergency when perhaps there be "lost" tribes in the wilderness, it be only appropriate and saving grace that the "lost" be led back to the authorised Tabernacle of The Lord. Essentially that is the scenario as acceptable to The YaJu Priesthood with regards to the great saint and prophet Moses.

         There were some primordial theologies that "evolved" in different cultures; but that which was imposed upon by The Lost House of Jacob was not a "new thing". Even though they may have implemented a ragged and distorted form of their old practices, that they could hardly remember after hundreds of years in Egyptian bondage, and even with Moses as seer, they still purported to be "Hebrews", members of an existing ancient religion of Canaan that was already sacramentally and historically vowed in service onto the Holy Fires of YHVH; The One Almighty Lord as encoded away from the lay communities as they by "The Original Jews".

         Everything in the proposals of Moses indicated they were claiming disciplic succession, and authorisation to The YHVH Holy of Holies, while coming from hundreds of years in exiled Egyptian slavery, being mutated barbarian tribes of enslaved shepherds distant from the priesthood in any congregation; and certainly estranged and unauthorised to the authentic priesthood services of YHVH. This is not to say they were total frauds, but simply desperate detoured lay persons devoutly trying to return home and to purify themselves in the process.

         The Law of Moses, while dramatically portrayed, was readily of public knowledge, being an everyday inclusion of Egyptian common law, such as the first five commandments. Even other mixed Semitic myths of Cain and Able, and other jumbled junk to purport originality to the perennial plight of Moses were contained parallel in the local lores.

         If they had sought to purely create a new religion based solely upon the Sinai enlightenment and the holy offering fires instructed by Moses, then there would have been more classical acceptance of Moses's "sole prophet status" to be authentic, and the source of being directly initiated into the Science of The Holy Name by The Ju Sacred Fire of the Sacred Consummation; but they did not. They claimed to be Jews of Canaan, returning to their perpetually practising homeland. Were there not Levites in Jericho? In Ai? Were they not also a peccable flock?

         It is acknowledged within the vast YaJu sciences that even when one has been blessed with direct enlightenment can "fall down" again to the previously conditioned platform, and become lost in the symbolic perceptions of the ego and temporal embodiment. In this regard, our research did not eliminate the possibility that Moses was in fact initiated by The Lord Himself at Sinai into remembrance of The YaJu Sciences of The Holy Name, and the offerings by Holy Fire Altars of The Sacred Consummation. That is what The House of Jacob proposes, but there other evidences to substantiate the YaJu "foreknowledge" connection attributed to the slaves of Geshon, or the possibility of other enslaved or deceased YaJu Priests of Canaan who had been enslaved also in Egypt along with the other Asiatics. Or did Moses just get it all out of the Blue White flames of the bush? It may have been that they had been that some captured YaJus had tortured out of their minds by the Egyptians, that they broke their vows of The Holy of Holies, and by offence to The Holy Name and the Holy Fires, may have instructed the assembled Hebrew slave culture in some of their YaJu precepts, and sanctification sciences amidst the squalor under mindless duress. Let it just suffice to say that Moses did not add much that was new, nor original. The YaJus maintained Juhoma, the Holy Fires; they were restricted to only offering cattle communally, and any private or quartered slaughter was an excommunicable offence; they held The Holy Name, and the Very Lord Himself to be unspeakable, inconceivable, and totally and absolutely beyond rendition by any object throughout Infinity. All these basic issues were quite clear.

         The Books of Moses are very questionable in time/space as to when, where and by whom they were compiled. Moses's followers could have established a more creditable basis to purport being an emerged Theology if they had contained testamentary elaboration of the Sinai Enlightenment to peaceful devotional service; and not fallen to conglomerations of common usages, nor been directed by Joshua in holocaustal anti-Semitic atrocities against their ancestral Canaanite brothers. But their basic premise was that they were the Hebrew/Jewish People of Canaan returning to claim their inheritance, which they unsubstantiated by slaughtering the original Hebrews, whom they viewed with tainted prejudice as "different" than they were; or didn't actually care to view except as blooded wine spoils. Not only did they destroy the sanctity of those Canaanites, they stole and merged the Canaanite Hebrew Religion with the Teachings of Moses. Then they imposed and evolved a purely congregational conglomeration of conjure to disguise themselves under their holocaustal blood tainted priesthood, posing as the Hebrews they murdered. The Books of Moses, many consider, to be such merged later compilations.

         Theological authority is somewhat difficult for the democratic American anti-priesthood "reform supermarket butcher" types to accept. Most all are led to believe that they have foremost a "personal relationship" with God; and that it is by their inner unique authority that they establish the priesthood to serve them. The priests under their scenario are "pastors" tending the needs of the flock; if they needed a marriage performed on the prairie, everyone gathered twice a year for the travelling minister who could "read" the scriptures, and perform the sacraments of whatever necessity "they" needed. No where do the Reform Jews or Protestants accept that priests serve God, other than for themselves to be serviced.

         This is not to say that The House of Jacob did not establish a vast methodology, and for the most part a vastly self-justifying sociology of atrocity; and evolved a hideously absurd Middle European "Top Hat" befoolery traipsing through their wasteland desert slugging dragged boots in the sand as structures of their purported priest hood. They did. We have lots of it. The Torah, The Talmud, and all the profuse literatures which we classify as Judeo-Islamic-Christian; and all the Orders of 3,000 years. But despite their mass, there is little substance as pertains to The Holy Name offerings onto The Holy Fire of The Sacred Consummation, Ju.

         Moses did make sure, at least, that we received this message: